Files
Sankofa/docs/fairness-audit/ORCHESTRATION_DESIGN.md
defiQUG 9daf1fd378 Apply Composer changes: comprehensive API updates, migrations, middleware, and infrastructure improvements
- Add comprehensive database migrations (001-024) for schema evolution
- Enhance API schema with expanded type definitions and resolvers
- Add new middleware: audit logging, rate limiting, MFA enforcement, security, tenant auth
- Implement new services: AI optimization, billing, blockchain, compliance, marketplace
- Add adapter layer for cloud integrations (Cloudflare, Kubernetes, Proxmox, storage)
- Update Crossplane provider with enhanced VM management capabilities
- Add comprehensive test suite for API endpoints and services
- Update frontend components with improved GraphQL subscriptions and real-time updates
- Enhance security configurations and headers (CSP, CORS, etc.)
- Update documentation and configuration files
- Add new CI/CD workflows and validation scripts
- Implement design system improvements and UI enhancements
2025-12-12 18:01:35 -08:00

4.8 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Fairness Audit Orchestration - Design Document

Design Philosophy

We design from the end result backwards.

First we list every output you want (reports, files, metrics), then we calculate how much input validation and enrichment is needed — roughly 2× your input effort — and size the total job at about 3.2× the input.

You only choose:

  1. What goes in (Input)
  2. What comes out (Output)
  3. When it needs to be ready (Timeline)

The orchestration engine does everything in between.

Mathematical Model

Core Formula

Total Process Load = O + 2I ≈ 3.2I

Where:

  • I = Input size/effort (units)
  • O = Total output effort (sum of output weights)
  • 2I = Two input processing passes (ingestion + enrichment + fairness evaluation)

Design Target

O ≈ 1.2 × I

This means for a typical input of 100 units:

  • Output should be around 120 units
  • Total load ≈ 320 units
  • Input passes = 200 units (2 × 100)

Why 2× Input?

The input requires two full passes:

  1. Ingestion & Enrichment: Load data, validate, enrich with metadata
  2. Fairness Evaluation: Run fairness algorithms, calculate metrics

Each pass processes the full input, hence 2×.

Output Weight Guidelines

Weight Calculation Factors

  1. Complexity: How complex is the output to generate?
  2. Data Volume: How much data does it contain?
  3. Processing Time: How long does generation take?
  4. Dependencies: Does it depend on other outputs?
Complexity Typical Weight Range Examples
Simple 0.5 - 1.0 Metrics export, Alert config
Medium 1.0 - 2.0 CSV exports, JSON reports
Complex 2.0 - 3.0 PDF reports, Dashboards, Compliance docs

Weight Examples

  • Metrics Export (1.0): Simple calculation, small output
  • Flagged Cases CSV (1.5): Medium complexity, moderate data
  • Fairness Audit PDF (2.5): Complex formatting, large output
  • Compliance Report (2.2): Complex structure, regulatory requirements

Input Load Estimation

Base Calculation

Base = 100 units

+ Sensitive Attributes: 20 units each
+ Date Range: 5 units per day
+ Filters: 10 units each
+ Estimated Size: Use if provided

Example Calculations

Small Dataset:

  • 2 sensitive attributes
  • 7-day range
  • 1 filter
  • Load = 100 + (2×20) + (7×5) + (1×10) = 165 units

Large Dataset:

  • 5 sensitive attributes
  • 90-day range
  • 5 filters
  • Load = 100 + (5×20) + (90×5) + (5×10) = 700 units

Timeline Validation

SLA Parsing

Supports formats:

  • "2 hours"
  • "1 day"
  • "30 minutes"
  • "45 seconds"

Feasibility Checks

  1. Time Check: estimatedTime ≤ maxTimeSeconds
  2. Output Check: outputLoad ≤ 1.5 × (inputLoad × 1.2)
  3. Total Load Check: totalLoad ≤ 1.3 × (inputLoad × 3.2)

Warning Thresholds

  • Critical: Estimated time exceeds timeline
  • Warning: Estimated time > 80% of timeline
  • Info: Output load > 1.5× target

User Experience Flow

Step 1: Select Outputs

  • User checks desired outputs
  • Engine calculates O in real-time
  • Shows total output load

Step 2: Specify Input

  • User enters dataset, attributes, range
  • Engine calculates I in real-time
  • Shows estimated input load

Step 3: Set Timeline

  • User selects mode and SLA
  • Engine validates feasibility
  • Shows estimated time and warnings

Step 4: Review & Run

  • Engine shows complete analysis
  • User reviews warnings/suggestions
  • User confirms and runs

Error Handling

Invalid Configurations

  1. No Outputs Selected: Disable run button
  2. No Dataset: Disable run button
  3. Invalid SLA Format: Show format hint
  4. Infeasible Timeline: Show suggestions

Suggestions

Engine provides actionable suggestions:

  • "Consider reducing outputs"
  • "Consider extending timeline"
  • "Consider simplifying input filters"

Performance Considerations

Processing Rates

Rates are configurable and can be tuned based on:

  • Hardware capabilities
  • Network bandwidth
  • Concurrent job limits
  • Historical performance data

Optimization Strategies

  1. Parallel Processing: Process outputs in parallel when possible
  2. Caching: Cache intermediate results
  3. Batch Processing: Batch similar operations
  4. Resource Allocation: Allocate resources based on load

Future Enhancements

  1. Machine Learning: Learn from historical runs to improve estimates
  2. Dynamic Weights: Adjust weights based on actual performance
  3. Resource Scaling: Automatically scale resources based on load
  4. Cost Estimation: Add cost estimates alongside time estimates
  5. Multi-Tenant: Support multiple concurrent orchestrations