417 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
417 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# VISUAL DIAGRAMS SPECIFICATION
|
||
|
|
## Requirements and Specifications for Visual Diagrams and Architecture Diagrams
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## DOCUMENT METADATA
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Document Number:** DBIS-SYS-VDS-001
|
||
|
|
**Version:** 1.0
|
||
|
|
**Date:** 2024-12-08
|
||
|
|
**Classification:** UNCLASSIFIED
|
||
|
|
**Authority:** DBIS Executive Directorate
|
||
|
|
**Approved By:** [See signature block - requires SCC approval]
|
||
|
|
**Effective Date:** 2024-12-08
|
||
|
|
**Distribution:** Distribution Statement A - Public Release Unlimited
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Change Log:**
|
||
|
|
- 2024-12-08 - Version 1.0 - Initial Release
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This document specifies requirements for creating visual diagrams and architecture diagrams for the DBIS documentation corpus. It defines diagram types, requirements, standards, and implementation guidelines.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Provide comprehensive specifications for visual diagram creation to enhance documentation understanding and usability.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## DIAGRAM CATEGORIES
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 1. Network Architecture Diagrams
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 1.1 Logical Network Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show logical network structure and relationships
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- **CSP-1113 Logical Architecture:**
|
||
|
|
- Cyber-Sovereign Zone (CSZ) logical structure
|
||
|
|
- Network zones and boundaries
|
||
|
|
- Logical connections and data flows
|
||
|
|
- Security zones and trust boundaries
|
||
|
|
- Reference: [CSP-1113 Technical Specification](../../csp_1113/CSP-1113_Technical_Specification.md)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **GRU Reserve System Logical Architecture:**
|
||
|
|
- Reserve system logical structure
|
||
|
|
- Component relationships
|
||
|
|
- Data flow paths
|
||
|
|
- Integration points
|
||
|
|
- Reference: [GRU Reserve System Whitepaper](../../gru_reserve_system/GRU_Reserve_System_Whitepaper.md)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: Professional, clear, color-coded
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Zones, components, connections, labels
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow network diagram conventions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 1.2 Physical Network Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show physical network infrastructure
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- Physical network topology
|
||
|
|
- Server locations and connections
|
||
|
|
- Network equipment placement
|
||
|
|
- Physical security boundaries
|
||
|
|
- Redundancy and failover paths
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: Technical, detailed, accurate
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Physical components, connections, locations
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow physical network diagram standards
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 1.3 Security Zones
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show security zone architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- Security zone boundaries
|
||
|
|
- Zone classifications
|
||
|
|
- Access control points
|
||
|
|
- Security perimeters
|
||
|
|
- Zone relationships
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: Security-focused, clear boundaries
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Zones, boundaries, access points, classifications
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow security architecture conventions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 2. System Architecture Diagrams
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 2.1 High-Level System Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show overall system architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- DBIS system architecture overview
|
||
|
|
- Major system components
|
||
|
|
- Component relationships
|
||
|
|
- Integration points
|
||
|
|
- Data flows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: High-level, conceptual, clear
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Systems, components, relationships
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow system architecture conventions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 2.2 Component Architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show detailed component architecture
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- Individual component architectures
|
||
|
|
- Component interfaces
|
||
|
|
- Internal component structure
|
||
|
|
- Component dependencies
|
||
|
|
- Component interactions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: Detailed, technical, accurate
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Components, interfaces, dependencies
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow component diagram standards
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 3. Data Flow Diagrams
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 3.1 Process Data Flows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show data flow through processes
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- Transaction data flows
|
||
|
|
- Reserve system data flows
|
||
|
|
- Security data flows
|
||
|
|
- Compliance data flows
|
||
|
|
- Operational data flows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: Process-focused, clear flows
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Processes, data stores, data flows, external entities
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow DFD conventions (Gane-Sarson or Yourdon)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 3.2 System Data Flows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show data flow between systems
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- Inter-system data flows
|
||
|
|
- Integration data flows
|
||
|
|
- API data flows
|
||
|
|
- Database data flows
|
||
|
|
- External system data flows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: System-focused, integration view
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Systems, data flows, transformations
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow system DFD conventions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 4. Process Flow Diagrams
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 4.1 Business Process Flows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show business process workflows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- Budget approval process flow
|
||
|
|
- Membership application process flow
|
||
|
|
- Treaty negotiation process flow
|
||
|
|
- Emergency response process flow
|
||
|
|
- Dispute resolution process flow
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: Process-focused, clear steps
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Process steps, decisions, flows, roles
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow BPMN or flowchart conventions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 4.2 Operational Process Flows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show operational workflows
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- Change management process flow
|
||
|
|
- Service delivery process flow
|
||
|
|
- Data migration process flow
|
||
|
|
- Backup/recovery process flow
|
||
|
|
- User access management process flow
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: Operational, detailed, actionable
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Steps, decisions, roles, timelines
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow process flow conventions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### 5. Entity Relationship Diagrams
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### 5.1 Data Model Diagrams
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Purpose:** Show data relationships
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Diagrams:**
|
||
|
|
- Reserve system data model
|
||
|
|
- Transaction data model
|
||
|
|
- Member data model
|
||
|
|
- Compliance data model
|
||
|
|
- Security data model
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Specifications:**
|
||
|
|
- Format: Vector graphics (SVG, PDF)
|
||
|
|
- Style: Data-focused, clear relationships
|
||
|
|
- Elements: Entities, attributes, relationships, cardinality
|
||
|
|
- Standards: Follow ERD conventions (Crow's Foot or Chen)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## DIAGRAM REQUIREMENTS
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Technical Requirements
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Format Standards:**
|
||
|
|
- Primary: Vector graphics (SVG preferred, PDF acceptable)
|
||
|
|
- Secondary: Raster graphics (PNG, high resolution, 300 DPI minimum)
|
||
|
|
- Version control: Source files maintained (e.g., .drawio, .vsd, .ai)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Quality Standards:**
|
||
|
|
- Resolution: Minimum 300 DPI for print, scalable for digital
|
||
|
|
- Colors: Professional color scheme, accessible (WCAG AA compliant)
|
||
|
|
- Typography: Clear, readable fonts, consistent sizing
|
||
|
|
- Accuracy: Technically accurate, reviewed by subject matter experts
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**File Organization:**
|
||
|
|
- Location: `visual_assets/diagrams/` directory
|
||
|
|
- Naming: Descriptive, consistent naming convention
|
||
|
|
- Versioning: Version numbers in filenames
|
||
|
|
- Documentation: Each diagram documented with metadata
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Content Requirements
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Required Elements:**
|
||
|
|
- Title and description
|
||
|
|
- Legend/key (if needed)
|
||
|
|
- Version and date
|
||
|
|
- Author/creator
|
||
|
|
- Reference to source documents
|
||
|
|
- Notes/explanations (if needed)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Standards Compliance:**
|
||
|
|
- Follow DoD/MilSpec diagram standards (if applicable)
|
||
|
|
- Comply with technical documentation standards
|
||
|
|
- Maintain consistency across diagrams
|
||
|
|
- Ensure accessibility compliance
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Phase 1: Network Architecture Diagrams (Month 1-2)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
||
|
|
- CSP-1113 logical architecture diagram
|
||
|
|
- GRU Reserve System logical architecture diagram
|
||
|
|
- Physical network architecture diagram
|
||
|
|
- Security zones diagram
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Resources:**
|
||
|
|
- Technical architect
|
||
|
|
- Graphic designer
|
||
|
|
- Subject matter experts
|
||
|
|
- Diagramming software
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Phase 2: System Architecture Diagrams (Month 2-3)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
||
|
|
- High-level system architecture diagram
|
||
|
|
- Component architecture diagrams (3-5 diagrams)
|
||
|
|
- Integration architecture diagram
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Resources:**
|
||
|
|
- System architect
|
||
|
|
- Graphic designer
|
||
|
|
- Technical experts
|
||
|
|
- Diagramming software
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Phase 3: Data Flow Diagrams (Month 3-4)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
||
|
|
- Transaction data flow diagram
|
||
|
|
- Reserve system data flow diagram
|
||
|
|
- Security data flow diagram
|
||
|
|
- Compliance data flow diagram
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Resources:**
|
||
|
|
- Process analyst
|
||
|
|
- Data architect
|
||
|
|
- Graphic designer
|
||
|
|
- Diagramming software
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Phase 4: Process Flow Diagrams (Month 4-5)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
||
|
|
- Budget approval process flow
|
||
|
|
- Membership application process flow
|
||
|
|
- Treaty negotiation process flow
|
||
|
|
- Emergency response process flow
|
||
|
|
- Dispute resolution process flow
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Resources:**
|
||
|
|
- Process analyst
|
||
|
|
- Business analyst
|
||
|
|
- Graphic designer
|
||
|
|
- Diagramming software
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Phase 5: Entity Relationship Diagrams (Month 5-6)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
||
|
|
- Reserve system data model
|
||
|
|
- Transaction data model
|
||
|
|
- Member data model
|
||
|
|
- Compliance data model
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Resources:**
|
||
|
|
- Data architect
|
||
|
|
- Database designer
|
||
|
|
- Graphic designer
|
||
|
|
- Diagramming software
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## TOOLS AND SOFTWARE
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Recommended Tools
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Diagramming Software:**
|
||
|
|
- Draw.io / diagrams.net (free, web-based)
|
||
|
|
- Lucidchart (professional, cloud-based)
|
||
|
|
- Microsoft Visio (professional, desktop)
|
||
|
|
- Adobe Illustrator (professional, vector graphics)
|
||
|
|
- PlantUML (code-based, technical diagrams)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**File Formats:**
|
||
|
|
- Source: .drawio, .vsd, .ai, .puml
|
||
|
|
- Export: SVG, PDF, PNG (high resolution)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## QUALITY ASSURANCE
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Review Process
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Technical Review:**
|
||
|
|
- Subject matter expert review
|
||
|
|
- Technical accuracy verification
|
||
|
|
- Completeness check
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. **Design Review:**
|
||
|
|
- Visual quality assessment
|
||
|
|
- Consistency check
|
||
|
|
- Accessibility verification
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. **Documentation Review:**
|
||
|
|
- Metadata completeness
|
||
|
|
- Reference accuracy
|
||
|
|
- Documentation quality
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Approval Process
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Technical accuracy: Subject matter expert approval
|
||
|
|
- Design quality: Design team approval
|
||
|
|
- Documentation: Documentation manager approval
|
||
|
|
- Final: Executive Directorate approval (for major diagrams)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## MAINTENANCE
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Update Procedures
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Diagrams updated when systems change
|
||
|
|
- Version control maintained
|
||
|
|
- Change documentation required
|
||
|
|
- Review and approval process followed
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Version Control
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Version numbers in filenames
|
||
|
|
- Change log maintained
|
||
|
|
- Previous versions archived
|
||
|
|
- Current versions clearly marked
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## RELATED DOCUMENTS
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [CSP-1113 Technical Specification](../../csp_1113/CSP-1113_Technical_Specification.md) - Technical specification
|
||
|
|
- [GRU Reserve System Whitepaper](../../gru_reserve_system/GRU_Reserve_System_Whitepaper.md) - Reserve system
|
||
|
|
- [Technical Standards](../../11_technical_specs/Technical_Standards.md) - Technical standards
|
||
|
|
- [Visual Assets Specifications](../../visual_assets/Visual_Assets_Specifications.md) - Visual assets
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**END OF VISUAL DIAGRAMS SPECIFICATION**
|
||
|
|
|