304 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
304 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# APPENDIX C: VALIDATION PROTOCOL SPECIFICATIONS
|
||
|
|
## Detailed Validation Protocol Implementations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Document Number:** DBIS-CSP-APP-C
|
||
|
|
**Version:** 1.0
|
||
|
|
**Date:** [Enter date in ISO 8601 format: YYYY-MM-DD]
|
||
|
|
**Classification:** CONFIDENTIAL
|
||
|
|
**Authority:** DBIS Technical Department
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## PREAMBLE
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This appendix provides detailed specifications for all validation protocols used in CSP-1113, including identity validation, transaction validation, system validation, and zero-knowledge validation protocols.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## PART I: IDENTITY VALIDATION PROTOCOL (IVP)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 1.1: IVP Overview
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol Purpose:** Verify identity of users, systems, and entities accessing CSZ resources.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol Version:** IVP-1.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol Flow:**
|
||
|
|
1. Identity claim submission
|
||
|
|
2. Credential verification
|
||
|
|
3. Multi-factor authentication
|
||
|
|
4. Certificate validation
|
||
|
|
5. Authorization check
|
||
|
|
6. Access grant/deny
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 1.2: Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Factor 1: Something You Know (Password/Passphrase)**
|
||
|
|
- **Requirements:**
|
||
|
|
- Minimum 16 characters
|
||
|
|
- Complexity: Upper case, lower case, numbers, special characters
|
||
|
|
- Not in password breach databases
|
||
|
|
- Changed every 90 days
|
||
|
|
- **Storage:** Hashed using Argon2id (256 MB memory, 5 iterations)
|
||
|
|
- **Transmission:** Never transmitted in plaintext
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Factor 2: Something You Have (Hardware Token/Certificate)**
|
||
|
|
- **Hardware Tokens:** FIDO2/WebAuthn compatible tokens
|
||
|
|
- **Software Tokens:** TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password) with 30-second windows
|
||
|
|
- **Certificates:** X.509 certificates with ECDSA P-384 or Ed25519 signatures
|
||
|
|
- **Storage:** Hardware tokens preferred, certificates in HSM
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Factor 3: Something You Are (Biometric - Optional)**
|
||
|
|
- **Biometric Types:** Fingerprint, facial recognition, iris scan
|
||
|
|
- **Storage:** Biometric templates encrypted and stored securely
|
||
|
|
- **Privacy:** Biometric data never leaves secure enclave
|
||
|
|
- **Fallback:** Alternative authentication if biometric fails
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**MFA Requirements:**
|
||
|
|
- **Standard Access:** Minimum 2 factors required
|
||
|
|
- **Privileged Access:** Minimum 3 factors required
|
||
|
|
- **Emergency Access:** Special procedures with additional verification
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 1.3: Certificate-Based Authentication
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Certificate Requirements:**
|
||
|
|
- **Format:** X.509 v3
|
||
|
|
- **Signature Algorithm:** ECDSA P-384 or Ed25519
|
||
|
|
- **Key Size:** 384 bits (ECDSA) or 256 bits (Ed25519)
|
||
|
|
- **Validity Period:** Maximum 1 year
|
||
|
|
- **Issuer:** DBIS Certificate Authority (CA) or approved external CA
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Certificate Validation:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Format Check:** Verify X.509 v3 format
|
||
|
|
2. **Signature Verification:** Verify certificate signature
|
||
|
|
3. **Chain Validation:** Validate full certificate chain to root CA
|
||
|
|
4. **Revocation Check:** Check Certificate Revocation List (CRL) or OCSP
|
||
|
|
5. **Validity Check:** Verify not before and not after dates
|
||
|
|
6. **Purpose Check:** Verify key usage and extended key usage extensions
|
||
|
|
7. **Name Check:** Verify subject name matches claimed identity
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Certificate Revocation:**
|
||
|
|
- **CRL:** Certificate Revocation List updated every 24 hours
|
||
|
|
- **OCSP:** Online Certificate Status Protocol for real-time checking
|
||
|
|
- **Revocation Reasons:** Key compromise, certificate compromise, superseded, cessation of operation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## PART II: TRANSACTION VALIDATION PROTOCOL (TVP)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 2.1: TVP Overview
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol Purpose:** Validate all transactions within CSZ to ensure integrity, authenticity, and compliance.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol Version:** TVP-1.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Transaction Components:**
|
||
|
|
- Transaction data
|
||
|
|
- Digital signature
|
||
|
|
- Timestamp
|
||
|
|
- Nonce (to prevent replay)
|
||
|
|
- Sequence number
|
||
|
|
- Metadata
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 2.2: Transaction Signature
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Signature Algorithm:** ECDSA P-384 or Ed25519
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Signature Process:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Transaction Hash:** Hash transaction data using SHA-3-512
|
||
|
|
2. **Signing:** Sign hash with private key using ECDSA or Ed25519
|
||
|
|
3. **Signature Format:** (r, s) for ECDSA, 64-byte signature for Ed25519
|
||
|
|
4. **Attach:** Attach signature to transaction
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Verification Process:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Extract Signature:** Extract signature from transaction
|
||
|
|
2. **Hash Transaction:** Hash transaction data (same as signing)
|
||
|
|
3. **Verify:** Verify signature using public key
|
||
|
|
4. **Result:** Accept if valid, reject if invalid
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 2.3: Timestamp Validation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Timestamp Requirements:**
|
||
|
|
- **Format:** ISO 8601 with timezone (e.g., 2024-01-15T10:30:00Z)
|
||
|
|
- **Precision:** Millisecond precision
|
||
|
|
- **Source:** Synchronized NTP time servers
|
||
|
|
- **Tolerance:** ±5 seconds from server time
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Timestamp Validation:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Format Check:** Verify ISO 8601 format
|
||
|
|
2. **Range Check:** Verify timestamp within acceptable range (not too old, not in future)
|
||
|
|
3. **Synchronization Check:** Verify timestamp synchronized with NTP
|
||
|
|
4. **Replay Check:** Verify timestamp not used in previous transaction
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 2.4: Nonce and Sequence Number
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Nonce Requirements:**
|
||
|
|
- **Size:** 128 bits (16 bytes)
|
||
|
|
- **Uniqueness:** Must be unique for each transaction
|
||
|
|
- **Generation:** Cryptographically secure random number
|
||
|
|
- **Validation:** Check nonce not used previously (within time window)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Sequence Number:**
|
||
|
|
- **Purpose:** Prevent transaction replay and ensure ordering
|
||
|
|
- **Format:** 64-bit integer
|
||
|
|
- **Increment:** Incremented for each transaction from same source
|
||
|
|
- **Validation:** Verify sequence number > last seen sequence number
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## PART III: SYSTEM VALIDATION PROTOCOL (SVP)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 3.1: SVP Overview
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol Purpose:** Validate system integrity, configuration, and compliance.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol Version:** SVP-1.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Validation Types:**
|
||
|
|
- System integrity measurement
|
||
|
|
- Configuration validation
|
||
|
|
- Patch and update verification
|
||
|
|
- Compliance checking
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 3.2: Integrity Measurement
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Measurement Methods:**
|
||
|
|
- **TPM-based:** Trusted Platform Module measurements
|
||
|
|
- **Secure Boot:** UEFI Secure Boot verification
|
||
|
|
- **File Integrity:** Hash-based file integrity checking
|
||
|
|
- **Runtime Integrity:** Continuous runtime integrity monitoring
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Measurement Process:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Baseline Establishment:** Establish known-good baseline measurements
|
||
|
|
2. **Current Measurement:** Measure current system state
|
||
|
|
3. **Comparison:** Compare current measurements to baseline
|
||
|
|
4. **Validation:** Accept if matches, flag if mismatch
|
||
|
|
5. **Reporting:** Report validation results
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Measurement Frequency:**
|
||
|
|
- **Boot-time:** Every system boot
|
||
|
|
- **Periodic:** Every 24 hours
|
||
|
|
- **Event-driven:** After configuration changes, updates, or suspicious activity
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 3.3: Configuration Validation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Configuration Checks:**
|
||
|
|
- **Security Settings:** Verify security settings match requirements
|
||
|
|
- **Access Controls:** Verify access control configurations
|
||
|
|
- **Network Settings:** Verify network configuration compliance
|
||
|
|
- **Service Configuration:** Verify service configurations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Validation Process:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Configuration Collection:** Collect current configuration
|
||
|
|
2. **Policy Comparison:** Compare to approved configuration policies
|
||
|
|
3. **Compliance Check:** Verify compliance with requirements
|
||
|
|
4. **Remediation:** Flag non-compliant configurations for remediation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## PART IV: ZERO-KNOWLEDGE VALIDATION PROTOCOLS
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 4.1: zk-SNARK Protocol
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol:** Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Use Case:** Prove reserve adequacy without disclosing exact amounts
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Circuit Specification:**
|
||
|
|
- **Statement:** "Reserves exceed minimum requirement"
|
||
|
|
- **Private Inputs:** Actual reserve amounts
|
||
|
|
- **Public Inputs:** Minimum requirement, public parameters
|
||
|
|
- **Output:** Proof that reserves are adequate
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Proof Generation:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Circuit Compilation:** Compile statement into arithmetic circuit
|
||
|
|
2. **Trusted Setup:** Perform trusted setup (minimized setup)
|
||
|
|
3. **Proof Generation:** Generate zk-SNARK proof
|
||
|
|
4. **Proof Size:** Optimized to < 1 KB
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Proof Verification:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Proof Receipt:** Receive proof and public inputs
|
||
|
|
2. **Verification:** Verify proof using verification key
|
||
|
|
3. **Result:** Accept if valid (proves statement without revealing private inputs)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Performance:**
|
||
|
|
- **Proof Generation:** < 10 seconds for typical statements
|
||
|
|
- **Proof Verification:** < 100 milliseconds
|
||
|
|
- **Proof Size:** < 1 KB
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 4.2: zk-STARK Protocol
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol:** Zero-Knowledge Scalable Transparent Argument of Knowledge
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Use Case:** Prove conversion validity without disclosing transaction details
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Advantages:**
|
||
|
|
- No trusted setup required
|
||
|
|
- Transparent (verification key is public randomness)
|
||
|
|
- Scalable to large computations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Proof Generation:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Computation:** Perform computation to be proven
|
||
|
|
2. **Trace Generation:** Generate execution trace
|
||
|
|
3. **Proof Generation:** Generate zk-STARK proof
|
||
|
|
4. **Proof Size:** Larger than zk-SNARK but no trusted setup
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Proof Verification:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Proof Receipt:** Receive proof
|
||
|
|
2. **Verification:** Verify proof (no trusted setup needed)
|
||
|
|
3. **Result:** Accept if valid
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Section 4.3: Bulletproof Range Proofs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Protocol:** Bulletproof range proofs
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Use Case:** Prove value is within range without revealing exact value
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Example:** Prove reserve amount is between $100M and $200M without revealing exact amount
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Proof Generation:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Value Commitment:** Commit to value using Pedersen commitment
|
||
|
|
2. **Range Proof:** Generate proof that committed value is in range
|
||
|
|
3. **Proof Size:** Logarithmic in range size
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Proof Verification:**
|
||
|
|
1. **Commitment Receipt:** Receive commitment and range proof
|
||
|
|
2. **Verification:** Verify range proof
|
||
|
|
3. **Result:** Accept if valid (proves value in range without revealing value)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIST
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] All validation protocols implemented
|
||
|
|
- [ ] MFA systems operational
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Certificate validation working
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Transaction validation functional
|
||
|
|
- [ ] System integrity measurement active
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Zero-knowledge proofs generating correctly
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Performance requirements met
|
||
|
|
- [ ] Security testing completed
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**END OF APPENDIX C**
|
||
|
|
|