Initial commit: add .gitignore and README
This commit is contained in:
275
API_GATEWAY_DESIGN.md
Normal file
275
API_GATEWAY_DESIGN.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
|
||||
# Unified API Gateway Design
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: 2025-01-27
|
||||
**Purpose**: Design document for unified API gateway
|
||||
**Status**: Design Document
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
This document outlines the design for a unified API gateway that will serve as a single entry point for all workspace projects, providing centralized authentication, rate limiting, and API versioning.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Overview
|
||||
|
||||
### Components
|
||||
|
||||
1. **API Gateway** (Kong, Traefik, or custom)
|
||||
2. **Authentication Service** (Keycloak, Auth0, or custom)
|
||||
3. **Rate Limiting Service** (Redis-based)
|
||||
4. **API Versioning** (Path-based or header-based)
|
||||
5. **Monitoring & Logging** (Prometheus, Grafana, Loki)
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Client
|
||||
↓
|
||||
API Gateway (Kong/Traefik)
|
||||
├── Authentication Layer
|
||||
├── Rate Limiting
|
||||
├── Request Routing
|
||||
└── Response Aggregation
|
||||
↓
|
||||
Backend Services
|
||||
├── dbis_core
|
||||
├── the_order
|
||||
├── Sankofa
|
||||
└── Other services
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Features
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Authentication & Authorization
|
||||
|
||||
**Methods**:
|
||||
- JWT tokens
|
||||
- API keys
|
||||
- OAuth2/OIDC
|
||||
- mTLS (for service-to-service)
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation**:
|
||||
- Centralized authentication service
|
||||
- Token validation
|
||||
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
|
||||
- Permission checking
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Rate Limiting
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategies**:
|
||||
- Per-user rate limits
|
||||
- Per-API rate limits
|
||||
- Per-IP rate limits
|
||||
- Tiered rate limits (free, paid, enterprise)
|
||||
|
||||
**Storage**: Redis for distributed rate limiting
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. API Versioning
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategy**: Path-based versioning
|
||||
- `/v1/api/...`
|
||||
- `/v2/api/...`
|
||||
|
||||
**Alternative**: Header-based (`Accept: application/vnd.api+json;version=2`)
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Request Routing
|
||||
|
||||
**Features**:
|
||||
- Path-based routing
|
||||
- Header-based routing
|
||||
- Load balancing
|
||||
- Health checks
|
||||
- Circuit breakers
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Monitoring & Observability
|
||||
|
||||
**Metrics**:
|
||||
- Request rate
|
||||
- Response times
|
||||
- Error rates
|
||||
- Authentication failures
|
||||
- Rate limit hits
|
||||
|
||||
**Logging**:
|
||||
- All requests logged
|
||||
- Structured logging (JSON)
|
||||
- Centralized log aggregation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Technology Options
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 1: Kong Gateway (Recommended)
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros**:
|
||||
- Feature-rich
|
||||
- Plugin ecosystem
|
||||
- Good documentation
|
||||
- Enterprise support available
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons**:
|
||||
- More complex setup
|
||||
- Higher resource usage
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 2: Traefik
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros**:
|
||||
- Kubernetes-native
|
||||
- Auto-discovery
|
||||
- Simpler setup
|
||||
- Lower resource usage
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons**:
|
||||
- Fewer built-in features
|
||||
- Less mature plugin ecosystem
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 3: Custom (Node.js/TypeScript)
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros**:
|
||||
- Full control
|
||||
- Custom features
|
||||
- Lightweight
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons**:
|
||||
- More development time
|
||||
- Maintenance burden
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation**: Kong Gateway for production, Traefik for simpler setups
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Basic Gateway (Weeks 1-2)
|
||||
- [ ] Deploy API gateway (Kong or Traefik)
|
||||
- [ ] Set up basic routing
|
||||
- [ ] Configure SSL/TLS
|
||||
- [ ] Set up monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Authentication (Weeks 3-4)
|
||||
- [ ] Integrate authentication service
|
||||
- [ ] Implement JWT validation
|
||||
- [ ] Set up RBAC
|
||||
- [ ] Test authentication flow
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Rate Limiting (Weeks 5-6)
|
||||
- [ ] Set up Redis for rate limiting
|
||||
- [ ] Configure rate limit rules
|
||||
- [ ] Implement tiered limits
|
||||
- [ ] Test rate limiting
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Advanced Features (Weeks 7-8)
|
||||
- [ ] API versioning
|
||||
- [ ] Request/response transformation
|
||||
- [ ] Caching
|
||||
- [ ] WebSocket support
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Migration (Weeks 9-12)
|
||||
- [ ] Migrate dbis_core to gateway
|
||||
- [ ] Migrate the_order to gateway
|
||||
- [ ] Migrate Sankofa to gateway
|
||||
- [ ] Migrate other services
|
||||
- [ ] Complete testing
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Example
|
||||
|
||||
### Kong Gateway Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
services:
|
||||
- name: dbis-core
|
||||
url: http://dbis-core:3000
|
||||
routes:
|
||||
- name: dbis-core-v1
|
||||
paths:
|
||||
- /v1/dbis
|
||||
plugins:
|
||||
- name: rate-limiting
|
||||
config:
|
||||
minute: 100
|
||||
hour: 1000
|
||||
- name: jwt
|
||||
config:
|
||||
secret_is_base64: false
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Traefik Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
http:
|
||||
routers:
|
||||
dbis-core:
|
||||
rule: "PathPrefix(`/v1/dbis`)"
|
||||
service: dbis-core
|
||||
middlewares:
|
||||
- auth
|
||||
- rate-limit
|
||||
services:
|
||||
dbis-core:
|
||||
loadBalancer:
|
||||
servers:
|
||||
- url: "http://dbis-core:3000"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### Authentication
|
||||
- JWT tokens with short expiration
|
||||
- Refresh token rotation
|
||||
- Token revocation
|
||||
- Secure token storage
|
||||
|
||||
### Rate Limiting
|
||||
- Prevent DDoS attacks
|
||||
- Protect against abuse
|
||||
- Fair resource allocation
|
||||
|
||||
### Network Security
|
||||
- mTLS for service-to-service
|
||||
- WAF (Web Application Firewall)
|
||||
- DDoS protection
|
||||
- IP whitelisting (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Monitoring & Alerting
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Metrics
|
||||
- Request rate per service
|
||||
- Response times (p50, p95, p99)
|
||||
- Error rates
|
||||
- Authentication failures
|
||||
- Rate limit hits
|
||||
- Gateway health
|
||||
|
||||
### Alerts
|
||||
- High error rate
|
||||
- Slow response times
|
||||
- Authentication failures spike
|
||||
- Rate limit exhaustion
|
||||
- Gateway downtime
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Single entry point for all APIs
|
||||
- [ ] Centralized authentication operational
|
||||
- [ ] Rate limiting functional
|
||||
- [ ] 80% of projects migrated to gateway
|
||||
- [ ] 50% reduction in authentication code duplication
|
||||
- [ ] Improved API security posture
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Last Updated**: 2025-01-27
|
||||
**Next Review**: After Phase 1 completion
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user