Files
metamask-integration/docs/SECURITY_AUDIT_PREPARATION.md
2026-03-02 12:14:14 -08:00

268 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown

# Security Audit Preparation - Smart Accounts
**Date**: 2026-01-26
**Network**: ChainID 138 (SMOM-DBIS-138)
---
## Overview
This document outlines the security audit preparation for Smart Accounts Kit integration contracts.
---
## Contracts to Audit
### 1. AccountWalletRegistryExtended
**File**: `contracts/smart-accounts/AccountWalletRegistryExtended.sol`
**Key Functions**:
- `linkSmartAccount()` - Links smart account to fiat account
- `isSmartAccount()` - Checks if wallet is smart account
- `setSmartAccountFactory()` - Updates factory address
- `setEntryPoint()` - Updates EntryPoint address
**Security Concerns**:
- Access control (role-based)
- Input validation
- Smart account verification
- Reentrancy protection
---
### 2. Smart Accounts Kit Contracts (External)
**Contracts**:
- EntryPoint (ERC-4337)
- AccountFactory
- Paymaster (optional)
**Note**: These are external contracts from MetaMask Smart Accounts Kit. Review their security audits.
---
## Audit Checklist
### Access Control
- [ ] Role-based access control implemented correctly
- [ ] Admin functions protected
- [ ] Role assignment verified
- [ ] Role revocation works correctly
### Input Validation
- [ ] Zero address checks
- [ ] Parameter validation
- [ ] Array bounds checking
- [ ] Type validation
### Smart Account Verification
- [ ] Contract detection works correctly
- [ ] Smart account validation
- [ ] Address format validation
- [ ] Duplicate prevention
### Reentrancy Protection
- [ ] Reentrancy guards in place
- [ ] State changes before external calls
- [ ] Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern
### Gas Optimization
- [ ] Gas-efficient storage patterns
- [ ] Loop optimization
- [ ] Unnecessary operations removed
### Event Emission
- [ ] All state changes emit events
- [ ] Event parameters complete
- [ ] Indexed parameters for filtering
---
## Known Security Considerations
### 1. Smart Account Verification
**Risk**: EOA could be mistaken for smart account
**Mitigation**:
- Check `extcodesize` > 0
- Verify contract has code
### 2. Factory Address Updates
**Risk**: Malicious factory address
**Mitigation**:
- Admin-only function
- Verify factory address before update
- Consider timelock for critical updates
### 3. EntryPoint Address Updates
**Risk**: Malicious EntryPoint address
**Mitigation**:
- Admin-only function
- Verify EntryPoint address
- Consider timelock for critical updates
---
## Testing Requirements
### Unit Tests
- [ ] Access control tests
- [ ] Input validation tests
- [ ] Smart account detection tests
- [ ] Edge case tests
### Integration Tests
- [ ] End-to-end flow tests
- [ ] Multi-contract interaction tests
- [ ] Failure mode tests
### Fuzz Tests
- [ ] Fuzz input parameters
- [ ] Fuzz state transitions
- [ ] Fuzz edge cases
### Invariant Tests
- [ ] State invariants
- [ ] Access control invariants
- [ ] Data consistency invariants
---
## Audit Deliverables
### 1. Code Documentation
- [ ] NatSpec comments on all functions
- [ ] Architecture documentation
- [ ] Security considerations documented
### 2. Test Coverage
- [ ] Unit test coverage > 90%
- [ ] Integration test coverage > 80%
- [ ] Fuzz test coverage
- [ ] Invariant test coverage
### 3. Security Documentation
- [ ] Threat model
- [ ] Security assumptions
- [ ] Known limitations
- [ ] Risk assessment
---
## Recommended Audit Firms
### Smart Contract Auditors
1. **Trail of Bits**
- Experience with account abstraction
- ERC-4337 expertise
2. **OpenZeppelin**
- Smart account experience
- Access control expertise
3. **Consensys Diligence**
- MetaMask integration experience
- Security best practices
4. **CertiK**
- Comprehensive audits
- Formal verification
---
## Audit Scope
### In Scope
- AccountWalletRegistryExtended contract
- Integration with existing AccountWalletRegistry
- Smart account linking logic
- Access control implementation
### Out of Scope
- MetaMask Smart Accounts Kit contracts (external)
- EntryPoint contract (external, already audited)
- AccountFactory contract (external, already audited)
- Paymaster contract (external, optional)
---
## Pre-Audit Checklist
### Code Quality
- [ ] Code formatted (forge fmt)
- [ ] No compiler warnings
- [ ] All tests passing
- [ ] Documentation complete
### Security
- [ ] Slither analysis run
- [ ] Mythril analysis run
- [ ] Manual security review
- [ ] Known issues documented
### Testing
- [ ] Unit tests complete
- [ ] Integration tests complete
- [ ] Fuzz tests complete
- [ ] Coverage > 90%
---
## Post-Audit Actions
### 1. Address Findings
- [ ] Review audit report
- [ ] Prioritize findings
- [ ] Fix critical issues
- [ ] Fix high-priority issues
- [ ] Document medium/low issues
### 2. Re-testing
- [ ] Re-run all tests
- [ ] Verify fixes
- [ ] Update documentation
### 3. Re-audit (if needed)
- [ ] Schedule re-audit for critical fixes
- [ ] Verify all issues resolved
---
## Resources
- [OpenZeppelin Security Best Practices](https://docs.openzeppelin.com/contracts/security)
- [Consensys Best Practices](https://consensys.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/)
- [Trail of Bits Security Guide](https://github.com/crytic/building-secure-contracts)
---
**Last Updated**: 2026-01-26