Files
smom-dbis-138/docs/security/SECURITY_SCORES.md

160 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Normal View History

# Security Score Interpretation
## Overview
This document explains how to interpret security scores from various scanning tools.
## SolidityScan Scores
### Score Range: 0-100
**90-100 (Excellent)**
- Production ready
- Minimal security risks
- Follows best practices
- No critical vulnerabilities
**70-89 (Good)**
- Minor improvements recommended
- Some security concerns
- Should address medium-severity issues
- Generally safe for production
**50-69 (Fair)**
- Should address issues before production
- Multiple security concerns
- Review high-severity issues
- Consider security audit
**0-49 (Poor)**
- Must fix before production
- Critical security vulnerabilities
- Significant security risks
- Requires immediate attention
## Common Vulnerabilities
### Critical (Score Impact: -20 to -50)
1. **Reentrancy**: Unauthorized external calls
2. **Integer Overflow**: Arithmetic operations
3. **Access Control**: Unauthorized access
4. **Unchecked External Calls**: Missing error handling
### High (Score Impact: -10 to -20)
1. **Gas Optimization**: Inefficient code
2. **Timestamp Dependence**: Block timestamp usage
3. **Front-running**: Transaction ordering
4. **Denial of Service**: Resource exhaustion
### Medium (Score Impact: -5 to -10)
1. **Code Quality**: Best practices
2. **Documentation**: Missing comments
3. **Error Handling**: Incomplete error handling
4. **Event Logging**: Missing events
### Low (Score Impact: -1 to -5)
1. **Naming Conventions**: Style issues
2. **Code Duplication**: Repeated code
3. **Unused Variables**: Dead code
4. **Style Issues**: Formatting
## Improving Scores
### Quick Wins
1. **Fix Critical Issues**: Address reentrancy, overflow
2. **Add Access Control**: Implement proper permissions
3. **Error Handling**: Add require/assert statements
4. **Events**: Emit events for important actions
### Medium-Term
1. **Code Review**: Regular security reviews
2. **Testing**: Comprehensive test coverage
3. **Documentation**: Document security decisions
4. **Best Practices**: Follow Solidity best practices
### Long-Term
1. **Security Audits**: Regular professional audits
2. **Formal Verification**: Mathematical proofs
3. **Bug Bounties**: Community security testing
4. **Continuous Improvement**: Ongoing security work
## Score Tracking
### Baseline
Establish baseline scores for:
- New contracts: Target 90+
- Existing contracts: Improve gradually
- Critical contracts: Must be 95+
### Trends
Monitor score trends:
- Improving: Good progress
- Stable: Maintain current level
- Declining: Investigate and fix
### Goals
Set score goals:
- **Q1**: Average score 80+
- **Q2**: Average score 85+
- **Q3**: Average score 90+
- **Q4**: Average score 95+
## Integration with CI/CD
### Score Thresholds
Set minimum score thresholds:
```yaml
# In CI/CD pipeline
- name: Check Security Score
run: |
SCORE=$(solidityscan --api-key $API_KEY --project-path . --format json | jq '.score')
if [ $SCORE -lt 80 ]; then
echo "Security score $SCORE is below threshold 80"
exit 1
fi
```
### Blocking Deployments
Block deployments if:
- Score < 70 for critical contracts
- Score < 80 for new contracts
- Critical vulnerabilities present
## Reporting
### Dashboard
View scores in:
- SolidityScan dashboard
- Blockscout UI
- CI/CD reports
- Security dashboard
### Alerts
Set up alerts for:
- Score drops below threshold
- New critical vulnerabilities
- Score improvements
- Scan failures
## References
- [SolidityScan Documentation](https://docs.solidityscan.com)
- [Security Scanning Process](docs/SECURITY_SCANNING.md)
- [Security Best Practices](docs/SECURITY.md)