Add Oracle Aggregator and CCIP Integration
- Introduced Aggregator.sol for Chainlink-compatible oracle functionality, including round-based updates and access control. - Added OracleWithCCIP.sol to extend Aggregator with CCIP cross-chain messaging capabilities. - Created .gitmodules to include OpenZeppelin contracts as a submodule. - Developed a comprehensive deployment guide in NEXT_STEPS_COMPLETE_GUIDE.md for Phase 2 and smart contract deployment. - Implemented Vite configuration for the orchestration portal, supporting both Vue and React frameworks. - Added server-side logic for the Multi-Cloud Orchestration Portal, including API endpoints for environment management and monitoring. - Created scripts for resource import and usage validation across non-US regions. - Added tests for CCIP error handling and integration to ensure robust functionality. - Included various new files and directories for the orchestration portal and deployment scripts.
This commit is contained in:
defiQUG
159
docs/security/SECURITY_SCORES.md
Normal file
159
docs/security/SECURITY_SCORES.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
|
||||
# Security Score Interpretation
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This document explains how to interpret security scores from various scanning tools.
|
||||
|
||||
## SolidityScan Scores
|
||||
|
||||
### Score Range: 0-100
|
||||
|
||||
**90-100 (Excellent)**
|
||||
- Production ready
|
||||
- Minimal security risks
|
||||
- Follows best practices
|
||||
- No critical vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
**70-89 (Good)**
|
||||
- Minor improvements recommended
|
||||
- Some security concerns
|
||||
- Should address medium-severity issues
|
||||
- Generally safe for production
|
||||
|
||||
**50-69 (Fair)**
|
||||
- Should address issues before production
|
||||
- Multiple security concerns
|
||||
- Review high-severity issues
|
||||
- Consider security audit
|
||||
|
||||
**0-49 (Poor)**
|
||||
- Must fix before production
|
||||
- Critical security vulnerabilities
|
||||
- Significant security risks
|
||||
- Requires immediate attention
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical (Score Impact: -20 to -50)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Reentrancy**: Unauthorized external calls
|
||||
2. **Integer Overflow**: Arithmetic operations
|
||||
3. **Access Control**: Unauthorized access
|
||||
4. **Unchecked External Calls**: Missing error handling
|
||||
|
||||
### High (Score Impact: -10 to -20)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Gas Optimization**: Inefficient code
|
||||
2. **Timestamp Dependence**: Block timestamp usage
|
||||
3. **Front-running**: Transaction ordering
|
||||
4. **Denial of Service**: Resource exhaustion
|
||||
|
||||
### Medium (Score Impact: -5 to -10)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code Quality**: Best practices
|
||||
2. **Documentation**: Missing comments
|
||||
3. **Error Handling**: Incomplete error handling
|
||||
4. **Event Logging**: Missing events
|
||||
|
||||
### Low (Score Impact: -1 to -5)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Naming Conventions**: Style issues
|
||||
2. **Code Duplication**: Repeated code
|
||||
3. **Unused Variables**: Dead code
|
||||
4. **Style Issues**: Formatting
|
||||
|
||||
## Improving Scores
|
||||
|
||||
### Quick Wins
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Fix Critical Issues**: Address reentrancy, overflow
|
||||
2. **Add Access Control**: Implement proper permissions
|
||||
3. **Error Handling**: Add require/assert statements
|
||||
4. **Events**: Emit events for important actions
|
||||
|
||||
### Medium-Term
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code Review**: Regular security reviews
|
||||
2. **Testing**: Comprehensive test coverage
|
||||
3. **Documentation**: Document security decisions
|
||||
4. **Best Practices**: Follow Solidity best practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Long-Term
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Security Audits**: Regular professional audits
|
||||
2. **Formal Verification**: Mathematical proofs
|
||||
3. **Bug Bounties**: Community security testing
|
||||
4. **Continuous Improvement**: Ongoing security work
|
||||
|
||||
## Score Tracking
|
||||
|
||||
### Baseline
|
||||
|
||||
Establish baseline scores for:
|
||||
- New contracts: Target 90+
|
||||
- Existing contracts: Improve gradually
|
||||
- Critical contracts: Must be 95+
|
||||
|
||||
### Trends
|
||||
|
||||
Monitor score trends:
|
||||
- Improving: Good progress
|
||||
- Stable: Maintain current level
|
||||
- Declining: Investigate and fix
|
||||
|
||||
### Goals
|
||||
|
||||
Set score goals:
|
||||
- **Q1**: Average score 80+
|
||||
- **Q2**: Average score 85+
|
||||
- **Q3**: Average score 90+
|
||||
- **Q4**: Average score 95+
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with CI/CD
|
||||
|
||||
### Score Thresholds
|
||||
|
||||
Set minimum score thresholds:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# In CI/CD pipeline
|
||||
- name: Check Security Score
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
SCORE=$(solidityscan --api-key $API_KEY --project-path . --format json | jq '.score')
|
||||
if [ $SCORE -lt 80 ]; then
|
||||
echo "Security score $SCORE is below threshold 80"
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Blocking Deployments
|
||||
|
||||
Block deployments if:
|
||||
- Score < 70 for critical contracts
|
||||
- Score < 80 for new contracts
|
||||
- Critical vulnerabilities present
|
||||
|
||||
## Reporting
|
||||
|
||||
### Dashboard
|
||||
|
||||
View scores in:
|
||||
- SolidityScan dashboard
|
||||
- Blockscout UI
|
||||
- CI/CD reports
|
||||
- Security dashboard
|
||||
|
||||
### Alerts
|
||||
|
||||
Set up alerts for:
|
||||
- Score drops below threshold
|
||||
- New critical vulnerabilities
|
||||
- Score improvements
|
||||
- Scan failures
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- [SolidityScan Documentation](https://docs.solidityscan.com)
|
||||
- [Security Scanning Process](docs/SECURITY_SCANNING.md)
|
||||
- [Security Best Practices](docs/SECURITY.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user